Aircraft access has evolved.

Today’s buyers can choose among:

• Full ownership with financing
• Operating or capital leases
• Fractional ownership programs

Each structure offers advantages and trade-offs.

---

Full Ownership with Financing

Pros:

• Complete operational control
• Customization flexibility
• Long-term asset value retention
• Tax planning opportunities

Cons:

• Capital commitment
• Maintenance responsibility
• Market exposure

Best for owners with consistent utilization needs.

---

Aircraft Leasing

Leasing may offer:

• Lower upfront capital
• Structured usage flexibility
• Shorter commitment horizons

However:

• No long-term equity
• Contractual usage limits
• End-of-term conditions

Leasing can be effective for defined-term operational needs.

---

Fractional Ownership

Fractional programs provide:

• Lower entry cost
• Shared maintenance burden
• Guaranteed access programs

But:

• Limited customization
• Hourly usage caps
• Ongoing management fees

Often ideal for predictable, moderate usage.

---

Financing as a Strategic Tool

Even within ownership, financing provides flexibility:

• Preserves liquidity
• Enhances capital allocation
• Aligns cost with utilization

The right choice depends on mission profile, capital priorities, and long-term strategy.

---

Final Thought

Aircraft access should serve your mission—not define it.

Whether through financing, leasing, or fractional structures, the key is alignment.

When structure aligns with mission, ownership becomes an asset—not a burden.